<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experimenting With a New Text Link Advertising Vendor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/06/22/experimenting-with-a-new-text-link-adverting-vendor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/06/22/experimenting-with-a-new-text-link-adverting-vendor/</link>
	<description>Web Design, Information Architecture, Usability, Marketing, Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/06/22/experimenting-with-a-new-text-link-adverting-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpurple.com/?p=290#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Sophie - sorry to see you go, but thanks for the comment. I&#039;d like to clarify a bit further. I&#039;m not advocating the use of inline links - popularized by companies like Kontera - that place sponsored links within the context of your content. I find that even when these links are visually distinguished from standard links, generally by using a different color and double underlines, they detract from usability and site quality. So yes I agree with you.

However, using sponsored text links in a designated &quot;sponsored links&quot; area of your site is a different story. I plan on placing them in a clearly labeled section in the right column of this site. This is really no different than the use of Google Adsense/Adwords. Yes you can argue that Adsense detracts from the overall quality of a website, but some sites are created with the purpose of generating ad revenue. It&#039;s one of the goals of this site. And Adsense isn&#039;t going away anytime soon.

It is possible to balance a variety of advertising techniques - including text links - and still maintain quality content and design.

Glen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sophie &#8211; sorry to see you go, but thanks for the comment. I&#8217;d like to clarify a bit further. I&#8217;m not advocating the use of inline links &#8211; popularized by companies like Kontera &#8211; that place sponsored links within the context of your content. I find that even when these links are visually distinguished from standard links, generally by using a different color and double underlines, they detract from usability and site quality. So yes I agree with you.</p>
<p>However, using sponsored text links in a designated &#8220;sponsored links&#8221; area of your site is a different story. I plan on placing them in a clearly labeled section in the right column of this site. This is really no different than the use of Google Adsense/Adwords. Yes you can argue that Adsense detracts from the overall quality of a website, but some sites are created with the purpose of generating ad revenue. It&#8217;s one of the goals of this site. And Adsense isn&#8217;t going away anytime soon.</p>
<p>It is possible to balance a variety of advertising techniques &#8211; including text links &#8211; and still maintain quality content and design.</p>
<p>Glen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/06/22/experimenting-with-a-new-text-link-adverting-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpurple.com/?p=290#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Text links have a higher click through rate because users think they are being passed to useful and informative content, not being sold something. This is a really sneaky and dishonest way to get people to click through to sales sites. People have learnt to ignore banner ads because they want content, so don&#039;t trick them into clicking on an ad disguised as a link. Text link ads may &#039;help pass on credibility and search engine ranking juice&#039; but they will destroy the credability of the site that uses them.

Even if you&#039;re just using this service to get people to your blog site, you shouldn&#039;t encourage these businesses which erode the usability of the internet.

I&#039;m really shocked you think this is a good idea and I&#039;m unsubscribing from your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Text links have a higher click through rate because users think they are being passed to useful and informative content, not being sold something. This is a really sneaky and dishonest way to get people to click through to sales sites. People have learnt to ignore banner ads because they want content, so don&#8217;t trick them into clicking on an ad disguised as a link. Text link ads may &#8216;help pass on credibility and search engine ranking juice&#8217; but they will destroy the credability of the site that uses them.</p>
<p>Even if you&#8217;re just using this service to get people to your blog site, you shouldn&#8217;t encourage these businesses which erode the usability of the internet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really shocked you think this is a good idea and I&#8217;m unsubscribing from your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

