<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Website Numbers are Lying to You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/06/your-website-numbers-are-lying-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/06/your-website-numbers-are-lying-to-you/</link>
	<description>Web Design, Information Architecture, Usability, Marketing, Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:14:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Tools to Quickly Measure a Website&#8217;s Popularity : FatPurple</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/06/your-website-numbers-are-lying-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Tools to Quickly Measure a Website&#8217;s Popularity : FatPurple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpurple.com/?p=181#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...] I also recently wrote about the discrepancies and inconsistencies between these tools. This may also be of interest &#8211; Your Website Numbers are Lying to You. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I also recently wrote about the discrepancies and inconsistencies between these tools. This may also be of interest &#8211; Your Website Numbers are Lying to You. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most Popular NFL Team Websites (and Least Popular) : FatPurple</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/06/your-website-numbers-are-lying-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Most Popular NFL Team Websites (and Least Popular) : FatPurple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpurple.com/?p=181#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] The numbers generally reflect the 2nd half of the 2009-2010 NFL season. As I’ve talked about here, Alexa and other traffic ranking providers can be pretty inaccurate.  But I needed some metrics to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The numbers generally reflect the 2nd half of the 2009-2010 NFL season. As I’ve talked about here, Alexa and other traffic ranking providers can be pretty inaccurate.  But I needed some metrics to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinOne</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/06/your-website-numbers-are-lying-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>VinOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpurple.com/?p=181#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I found that Google Analytics just isn&#039;t worth using for total numbers. I look to it more for trends, referral traffic, etc. When looking at it for percentage trending and conversions it&#039;s a great tool. I&#039;ve seen cases where on a particular day one of my adsense ads on a page actually generate more impressions than the page recorded views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that Google Analytics just isn&#8217;t worth using for total numbers. I look to it more for trends, referral traffic, etc. When looking at it for percentage trending and conversions it&#8217;s a great tool. I&#8217;ve seen cases where on a particular day one of my adsense ads on a page actually generate more impressions than the page recorded views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
