<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 50 Interactive Agencies / Web Firms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/04/top-50-interactive-agencies-web-firms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/04/top-50-interactive-agencies-web-firms/</link>
	<description>Web Design, Information Architecture, Usability, Marketing, Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:14:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim H</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/04/top-50-interactive-agencies-web-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpurple.com/?p=90#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Seems about right - but would like to see some more recent data. I think Razorfish/AvA and Sapient have gone back and forth battling for the top spot for years. Agency.com and Oglivey are more traditional PR firms I think - although it looks like this is just including OgilvyInteractive - otherwise their revenue number would be much larger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems about right &#8211; but would like to see some more recent data. I think Razorfish/AvA and Sapient have gone back and forth battling for the top spot for years. Agency.com and Oglivey are more traditional PR firms I think &#8211; although it looks like this is just including OgilvyInteractive &#8211; otherwise their revenue number would be much larger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
