<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 25 Technology Consulting Firms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/04/top-25-technology-consulting-firms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/04/top-25-technology-consulting-firms/</link>
	<description>Web Design, Information Architecture, Usability, Marketing, Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:14:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim H</title>
		<link>http://www.fatpurple.com/2010/03/04/top-25-technology-consulting-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatpurple.com/?p=103#comment-5</guid>
		<description>McKinsey &amp; Company often places first on these types of lists just based on existing reputation. Are these rankings really based on recent performance or legacy? Hard to say. You wonder how another company would actually supplant them at the top unless they had a major public hiccup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McKinsey &amp; Company often places first on these types of lists just based on existing reputation. Are these rankings really based on recent performance or legacy? Hard to say. You wonder how another company would actually supplant them at the top unless they had a major public hiccup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
